Breaking News Latest News Updates Current News Todays e-Bulletins My News Wire Headlines

Potential conflicts of interest - Google CEO Eric Schmidt

Posted by simontoffel on 6th August 2009

Google s CEO Eric Schmidt has resigned from the board of Apple because of potential conflicts of interest, as per a statement released by Apple on Monday.

This is a natural corollary to recent developments as Google and Apple find themselves pitted against each other with Google entering more segments where Apple has a dominant presence. Google’s Android operating system is devised for mobile phones that compete with Apple’s iPhone, while its Chrome browser and its plans for a Google operating system also compete with Apple’s products. Eric Schmidt has been with Google since 2001 and on Apple’s board since August 2006.

“Unfortunately, as Google enters more of Apple’s core businesses, with Android and now Chrome OS, Eric’s effectiveness as an Apple board member will be significantly diminished, since he will have to recuse himself from even larger portions of our meetings due to potential conflicts of interest,” said Apple CEO Steve Jobs.

“Therefore, we have mutually decided that now is the right time for Eric to resign his position on Apple’s board.” “I have very much enjoyed my time on the Apple board; it’s a fantastic company,” said Schmidt in a statement. “But as Apple explained, we’ve agreed it makes sense for me to step down now.”

Posted in Google News | No Comments »

Can the tight US economy help Microsoft beat back the cavalry charge

Posted by simontoffel on 2nd April 2009

San Francisco: Can the tight US economy help Microsoft beat back the cavalry charge of its much smaller, but much cooler, competitor Apple?

The software giant from Seattle seems to sense a whiff of opportunity in the air, bombarding the trendy maker of Macs, iPhones and iPods in ads and executive comments for being too expensive in these penny-pinching times.

The latest salvo comes in the form of widely screened TV ads, which show what Microsoft says are real life computer users shopping for new machines.

In one ad a bubbly, red-haired, 20-something named Lauren goes looking for a 17-inch laptop with a $1,000 budget. She walks out of the Apple store empty handed, proclaiming that she’s obviously “not cool enough to be a Mac person”, since the appropriate machine there would cost $2,000.

But Lauren finds several dream machines at a PC retailer, where she squeals with delight as she pays $699 for her new laptop and pockets $300 in change.

The ad ends with the tagline, “I’m Lauren, and I’m a PC”, an unabashed reference to Apple’s famous ads where an uber-cool actor portrays an Apple computer while a super nerd plays a hapless PC.

Even before the latest ads, signs were emerging that Apple’s exclusive cachet and relatively higher prices were hurting it in the market.

Unit sales for Apple computers were down 16 percent in February while the overall computer market increased by 10 percent, according to a research report by Morgan Stanley. Revenues at the iconic Silicon Valley company were down 22 percent compared to an 11 percent decline for the overall market.

Media experts are divided on whether Microsoft’s new campaign can blow a hole in Apple’s mythical status, especially as the company’s worldwide success with its iPhone and iPod products continues to draw customers into the Apple firmament.

“I don’t know what took Microsoft so long,” advertising executive Josh Barsch told E Commerce Times. “The biggest chink in Apple’s armour has always been its price tag.

“In flush times, the young and hip can afford to shell out more for a trendy machine. When they no longer have jobs and can’t pay their rent, it’s a different story.”

That message is reinforced by other Microsoft ads that feature kids performing all kinds of multimedia wizardry on their PCs.

But some say that Microsoft’s ads will ultimately backfire because they bring Apple into every purchase consideration. When users compare features, they could well find that the elegance, functionality and integrated software that are part of the Apple package are worth the extra money.

Recent Mac convert Greg Willis says he has no regrets about the switch. “Everything works smoothly right out of the box because it all comes from the same company,” he said. “I’m glad I paid the extra money. I got a quantum leap in quality.”

Others are not so sure that the extra expense is worthwhile. They argue that with less money to spend, they can forego the luxury of the Apple experience to save a few bucks. One of them is Jay Siegel, who has owned Macs for 25 years but recently bought a Windows PC as his main work computer.

“I’m getting my work done, using Windows. Surfing the Internet, using a web browser and a graphics programme all work on this computer,” noted the self-described Apple fan on Examiner.com.

“It may not be elegant or refined but it’s getting the job done for me. And it cost so much less. I’m sorry Apple, I just couldn’t justify those extra dollars right now. When the economy recovers and I have a bit more cash to spare I’m going to run, not walk, to buy another Mac.”

Posted in Microsoft News | No Comments »

Wal-Mart’s $99 iPhone: Rumor or True?

Posted by simontoffel on 9th December 2008

A cheaper version of Apple’s iPhone will be sold at Wal-Mart Stores Inc for $99 later this month, the New York Post said.

Two models of the popular device will hit shelves at the retail giant, the paper said, citing employees at several stores.

Employees also told San Jose-based Mercury News that the $99 iPhones would be 4-gigabyte models, and that Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) was attempting a pre-Christmas launch.

The iPhone went on sale starting July 11 at $199 for the model with 8 gigabytes of storage and $299 for the 16-gigabyte version.

However, iPhone users need to sign up with data service provider AT&T (NYSE: T) for a plan that costs at least $30 a month for unlimited Web access and another $5 for 200 text messages or $20 for unlimited texting.

Wal-Mart has been gaining market share and clout in the recession as cash-strapped shoppers seek out its low prices.

Neither Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) nor Wal-Mart were immediately available to comment.

Source: Reuters

add to del.icio.us Digg it Stumble It! Add to Blinkslist add to furl add to ma.gnolia add to simpy seed the vine TailRank

Posted in news | No Comments »

AT&T, Apple Want to Dismiss iPhone 3G Suit

Posted by simontoffel on 9th December 2008

AT&T (NYSE: T) and Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) want a New York court to dismiss a class-action suit claiming allegations about iPhone 3G problems don’t belong in a federal court and should be moved into an arbitration hearing.

In their filings, both Apple and AT&T disputed the lawsuit’s charges that they misrepresented the device’s performance on AT&T’s 3G network and said the case ought to be taken up outside of court. They said doing so would comply with AT&T’s user agreement, which stipulates that handset complaints would be handled in an arbitration process.

AT&T added in court documents that its arbitration process has been cited by at least one legal expert as excessively generous and open.

“To [our] knowledge, [our] provision is the most pro-consumer arbitration provision in the country,” AT&T said in its court filing, which notes that it pays all legal fees in arbitration, offers a minimum $5,000 settlement, limits penalties on a finding of a “frivolous” complaint to $125 and supports arbitration taking place at the plaintiff’s location.

The latest twist in the iPhone 3G’s legal travails comes as the holiday buying season arrives in full force — amid a depressed economic climate that has carriers and handset makers worried about end-of-year revenue. Last week, AT&T said that it would lay off 12,000 in a reorganization effort to save money. At the same time, however, the company said it is still banking on its wireless business remaining one of its healthiest.

The suit, filed Sept. 29 by Avi Koschitzki in New York State Supreme Court, initially alleged that Apple and AT&T misrepresented the device’s speed on the carrier’s network.

Koschitzki’s lawyers, who did not return calls by press time, amended the complaint on Nov. 12 to include a claim that the iPhone’s casing cracks too easily. The plaintiffs seek statutory, compensatory and punitive damages and want a jury trial.

Current court documents do not include a timeline for Koschitzki’s attorneys to respond to the arbitration and dismissal request.

Apple and AT&T did not respond with comments by press time. Both companies have told InternetNews.com they do not comment on pending legal action.

Since the iPhone 3G’s debut in June, there has been a smattering of court actions claiming faulty network connectivity issues. The New York suit is the lone lawsuit that includes AT&T as a defendant.

Two Alabama residents filed suit in last August claiming the smartphone does not fulfill promised performance and connectivity expectations. The court has since dismissed two of their three lawsuit claims but ruled the plaintiffs can move forward to seek compensation for what they claim are faulty devices.

add to del.icio.us Digg it Stumble It! Add to Blinkslist add to furl add to ma.gnolia add to simpy seed the vine TailRank

Posted in business | No Comments »